mattlap wrote:
Ok .... then who next? I've asked this question of you a few times and yet you can't give me an answer of what leader Hammond needs.
Hammond doesn't need a leader. Hammond needs a manager. Any honest manager would do. To say that Hammond needs a leader, implies that people can't manage their own affairs, to their own satisfaction, unless they are lead there by some elites who can lead the way. We've been led the way for so many years, yet we are sinking like lead.
mattlap wrote:
You have heard of the saying, "Don't hate the player, hate the game".
For you and Lubu it seems exactly the opposite. It's "Don't hate the game, hate the player".
Yes, I've heard it. It's a variation of "Don't hate the criminal, hate the crime." It's a dismissive way of excusing "bad" behavior.
"Hey, everybody's doing it! Don't blame me if the system is flawed/corrupt/criminal. I'm just playing the game!" Other than hollow political competition and the US Attorney, Tom McDermott, as the head of a decayed and rotting corpse known as the Lake County Democrat Party, has the most influence to affect that body, but he has proven to be yet another ailment of it, not healer of it.
mattlap wrote:
I haven't heard one word from either of you of functional ways to fix the problems of Hammond or actually change the way business is done. It seems to me that it just isn't your guy doing the business.
I'm not arrogant enough to say that I have the answers to fix Hammond's problems. I will say though, that self-serving political choices, patronage, graft, and other forms of corruption, weigh on those problems, and to expose and expunge them are steps in the right direction.