Argues Lubu in part: "Quite Pastrick-like, he thinks he has the Hammond Mayor's office for the asking, and he's been taking all he can since. Now he thinks he can influence elections and punish those he has a grudge with by spending against them."
Lol. But doesnt he in fact have Hammond, simply for the asking? And it readily appears he intends to use it as his base and HQ from which to plan and finance his campaign. The only question is who or what are the specific objectives? But when it comes to seeking higher office, Mac has little real choice in the matter. Existentially, it is dictated by the necessity of power that he progress and either increase his political stature or die out...fade away into comfortable upper middle-class mediocrity. Citing to Mailer:
"What we're talking is about the existential in politics, the need for a hero, the meaning of politics as the art of the possible. I have made perhaps a hundred small expeditions up the possible tributaries of this theme, and have dilated on the danger of our time — totalitarianism." (corporate and administrative.)
To realize the ontological authenticity yielded by existential self-actualization, adds Mailer, requires (if not presupposes) that, "one must be able to feel oneself—one must know one’s desires, one’s rages, one’s anguish, one must be aware of the character of one’s frustration and know what would satisfy it. The over-civilized man can be an existentialist only if it is chic, and deserts it quickly for the next chic. To be a real existentialist (Sartre admittedly to the contrary) one must be religious, one must have one’s sense of the “purposeâ€â€”whatever the purpose may be—but a life which is directed by one’s faith in the necessity of action is a life committed to the notion that the substratum of existence is the search, the end meaningful but mysterious; [and] it is impossible to live such a life unless one’s emotions provide their profound conviction."
Significantly more telling is McDermott's adoption & retention of the image displaying intertwined boxing gloves as the symbol (coat of arms?) thematically framing his approach to the realpolitik of domestic political conflicts. Perhaps it is an unconscious, postmodern iteration of a David out to confront giants in single-combat?
Still, it is existentially telling that McDermott has publicly, in terms political psychology, fixed upon the ring and not the stage. Again, Mailer's meditation during coverage of the 1962 Liston-Patterson bout in Chicago's Comiskey Park. "A man turns to boxing (activist/combative politics) because he discovers it is the best experience of his life. If he is a good fighter, his life in the center of the ring is more intense than it can be anywhere else, his mind is more exceptional than at any other time, his body has become a live part of his brain. Some men are geniuses when they are drunk; a good fighter feels a bit of genius when he is having a good fight."
Mailer went on to argue that this kind of illumination is realized not only from the discipline he has put on his body or the concentration of his mind to getting ready for his half hour in the open, but no, it comes as well from his choice to occupy the arena on an adventure whose end is unknown. For the length of his fight, he's on an adventure whose end is unknown. "For the length of his fight, he ceases to be finite in the usual sense, he is no longer a creature of a given size and dress with a name and some habits which are predictable."
Just a minor meditation.
|