2. we have the biggest river boat on earth set to open up in the next couple of weeks.Well the biggest barge anyway, since the boat will never sail again. I'm not real happy about that.
Actually it wasn't the money alone that persuaded me to vote yes the 2nd time. I voted against the boats the 1st time. It was the boat trip and the thought that one day it would dock in downtown Chicago which as you could imagine brought up all kinds of possibilities in my mind. Obviously that was never gonna happen, nor was it ever promised. Still my feeling was that the boats would be like the ones in Pinellas County Florida where you at least get a nice little mini cruse and a pretty night view to see. So that plus the promise that the money would go to infrastructure, and not general spending like what happened when the mills were footing the bills, won me over. This was one of my biggest reasons to oppose Team Slumlord along with an anticipated lax code enforcement of rental units.
Honestly, if the vote were held today and I knew it would be what it is today (or will be in a few weeks) and they eliminated the infrastructure requirements I'm not so sure that I wouldn't vote to oppose. But to it's credit Hammond has at least tried to use the money for infrastructure even when it didn't have to. Not like EC, for example, that is known to have handed out a casino related contract to about anybody who would go down to the library and fill out a form regardless of business viability.