Northwest Indiana Discussion
http://northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/

Daniel 11:20
http://northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=6327
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:57 am ]
Post subject:  Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Tiger1 [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

Get the popcorn ready, as the previews of the show are almost done, but the main show is about to begin.

Author:  Mirage [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

I'm sorry but that just makes no sense. Read the passage in context.

http://biblebrowser.com/daniel/11-20.htm

I'm reading through this commentary I just discovered and it addresses some of the problems with your contention.

http://www.frankcaw.com/Antichrist-Fallacies.html

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Mirage [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

Like I said, read the passage in context. You would REALLY have to stretch the truth out of shape to make a weak case here.

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Screech [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Mirage [ Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

Is that stretched out far enough for ya?

Actually it's way, way out there as far as a discussion of Daniel 11:20 is concerned.

Author:  Screech [ Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

:(

Author:  Mirage [ Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Daniel 11:20

This treatise of your has me wondering if you have been hanging out with the wackos of First Baptist Church in Hammond as they can be pretty bad about circular off track thinking themselves. I say again you are way off your topic and you really haven't refuted the alternate interpretation rendered and instead you have only proclaimed your self gained understanding.

I have had enough world history courses to see that what you espouse with respect to Daniel 11:20 is logically incorrect just by reading the KJV as the passages are in all likelihood past history for us today, not prophetic still yet future or current events.

I will go a step further and say it is my belief that prophetic passages yet to be fulfilled may in reality not be as mystical as some would have us believe. In fact they will probably seem quite natural many times as was the rebirth of Israel. For an example, to someone 4,000 years ago it would indeed seem a miracle for a man's voice to beam down from the heavens to be heard around the entire globe instantaneously. Could say the same for the ability of a stealth bomber to swoop down and unleash hell, fire, and brimstone quite literally.

But I'm really not sure what case you are trying to make. We can all agree that we live in troubled times and that it is highly doubtful the 2nd coming of Christ (in any form) would be more than 20 years away, and in fact likely a whole lot sooner than that.

That said, whether President Obama is the Antichrist or merely the opening act for him either way I think it is becoming clear that the undisputed unfilled prophetic events are not far away from becoming current events. But if the Biblical attack on Israel from the north comes and you're still here I'm wondering if you'll feel "left behind" (a little pun on the movie of the same name) or instead will then reassess your "conclusions."

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/