Hoosier Master? wrote:
Mirage wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said outside of the last sentence. True the major parties put us in this sinkhole, but since the Libertarians and one issue parties have absolutely 0 chance of changing what is without the assistance of people who are part of the 2 major parties I don't think telling them to "F" off is gonna help much. Might make YOU fell better for telling them off though.
Let me see... you stated that you disagree with the last sentence, then you agree that the two major parties got us here?
The two major parties are not going to help Libertarians, they are the ones who set up barriers that we have to topple to win elections. Hell, we have to jump hurdles to even get on the ballot in the first place. But we have and we do.
This is absolutely the wrong attitude, that's why it is so difficult to get Libertarians elected. People need to vote third parties and quit voting for who they think are going to win (this isn't a game) and start voting for the best candidate for the job. I laugh at people who are actually proud to be affiliated with the two major shameful parties.
Were you aware that there was rampant nation-wide vote fraud in this last election by the Republicans? The problem (for them) was that soooo many people turned out to vote AGAINST them that even with the fraud in place they lost seats?
Yes the major parties put us in this mess and yes it will take the help of some of their folds to effect reforms. Why is that so hard to grasp?
Let me summit all up for you dude. It's called
the swing vote. The
best you can hope for in the foreseeable future is the Dems & Republicans to be near evenly split as far as power sharing and to trade votes in exchange for changes YOU want to see happen. Yea, I know it's not what you want to hear. Then again your party wins minor skirmishes while losing all the major wars.
I suppose you're just hoping that if you work hard enough eventually people will see the folly of their ways and convert to your way of thinking. It won't happen. The closest something like that had a chance of happening since WW II was Ross Perot. We all know how that worked out.
I know a lot of conservatives could be pursuaded to come your party's way but for a couple of the party's core issues. For example conservatives will like most of your Constitutional constructionist views but could never go for tossing out all drug regulation. So while your party may make many valid claims nothing short of some form of destitution would ever make people consider crossing over en mass, which would have to happen if you refuse to compromise at all.