Mirage wrote:
Yes the major parties put us in this mess and yes it will take the help of some of their folds to effect reforms. Why is that so hard to grasp?
What does "some of thier folds" mean?
Mirage wrote:
Let me summit all up for you dude. It's called the swing vote. The best you can hope for in the foreseeable future is the Dems & Republicans to be near evenly split as far as power sharing and to trade votes in exchange for changes YOU want to see happen. Yea, I know it's not what you want to hear. Then again your party wins minor skirmishes while losing all the major wars.
Yeah, and in 1985 marijuans was the nations #2 most valuble agricultural crop behind only corn. I asked then head of NORML, Kevin Zeese, when it would reach #1 and he stated that wouldn't happen because they do to many thing with corn. In 1986 the price sky rocketed and lo and behold marijuana has held the #1 spot ever since.
The general voting pubic are so sick of being handed the same old s*** from the same old idiots that keep getting voted back in, we could have a major win as soon as they pull their collctive heads out of their asses and realize that even by voting for the Democrats as they did en masse in the last election there is not going to be the major changes unless they start voting for third party candidates.
(Pardon my french
)
Mirage wrote:
I suppose you're just hoping that if you work hard enough eventually people will see the folly of their ways and convert to your way of thinking. It won't happen.
If you look at the OLD Republican platform you'll see Libertarian written all over it. WE are the real Constitutional/conservatives now.
The original Democratic and Republican parties were formed in the 1790s and then, after much turbulence, again in the 1890s. The Libertarian Party was formed in the early 1970s and have been steadily growing ever since. That cannot be said of ANY other third party.
Mirage wrote:
The closest something like that had a chance of happening since WW II was Ross Perot. We all know how that worked out.
Don't insult us by comparing us with that phoney Fascist who hasn't even read the Constitution and made all his money off government contracts.
Mirage wrote:
I know a lot of conservatives could be pursuaded to come your party's way but for a couple of the party's core issues. For example conservatives will like most of your Constitutional constructionist views but could never go for tossing out all drug regulation.
Including the FDA, because they are the ones who are supposed to be protecting us, but instead are making sure corporations make their profits. One artificial which was denied approval for decades because it was/is classified as a poison suddenly becomes OK because Rumfield helped push for it's approval. Silicone breast implants just got unbanned because of pressure from corporations. Oh yeah, we really need that phoney FDA to look out for us!
Mirage wrote:
So while your party may make many valid claims nothing short of some form of destitution would ever make people consider crossing over en mass, which would have to happen if you refuse to compromise at all.
Compromise my liberties? *F* THAT! LIBERTY OR DEATH! Here's my flag: