nwi wrote:
forest ave. gump,
The comments here by your "on-line character" are a parody, right? Hypocrisy, projection and paranoia; hilarious.
I do not know why I keep responding to this absolute non-sense...
For the guy that levels 'ad hominem' rebuttals... who is ‘projecting’ now?
I am who I say I am, and speak write and act accordingly. My ‘on-line character’ is meant as moral fiber / reputation, and is not separate from who I am. Even those that strongly disagree with me would not dispute my consistency, or my argument’s perspective(s). Your you to infer that my on-line character is now hypocritical and a ‘parody’ is to conclude that you think you seem to know who I am. A ‘’parody’ is not funny unless you know what it is spoofing… which you do not know me.
I believe you think I am someone else, and therefore the joke is on you… what makes it even funnier is that YOU created the joke and are continually adding to the punch line. Too bad it is a self-deprecating process. Really what makes my posts seem to set you off? What exchange or thread set the tone for your responses to my posts? Please tell me that you labeling me a hypocrite is based upon more than one thread? (Which I again, state you are incorrect in your assessment.)
Please answer the question posed previously, why do you post? What is your point or purpose? I stated in great detail my point, purpose and perspective for starting to post on these now collective ‘Boards.’ By the way, I still have only one screen name, and I need not to have ulterior names or agendas, because I passionately speak my truth. And will research to support my claims or beliefs, and will give credence to credible information. You seem to be on the other hand in the belief that your “well educated†opinion is superior to any conflicting opinions. That is all they are: "opinions." (And let’s remember Clint Eastwood’s quote from the “Dirty Harry†movies about ‘opinions’… he failed to mention though that some are bigger than others… lol.. no pun intended.)