| Northwest Indiana Discussion http://northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/ |
|
| difference between us and them. http://northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=7676 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | suzyq [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | difference between us and them. |
This just about says it all..This is the difference between us and them. This pretty much describes our Country today. If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn`t buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed. If a conservative is a veget arian, he doesn`t eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone. If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy. A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good. If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect. If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful. Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection. If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him. If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down. If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!) If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his. If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed. If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues. If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh. A liberal will delete it because he's "offended". |
|
| Author: | karent [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
If a conservative doesn't like abortion, he thinks it should be outlawed. If a liberal doesn't approve of abortion, he doesn't have one. |
|
| Author: | USMarine [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: If a conservative doesn't like abortion, he thinks it should be outlawed. If a liberal doesn't approve of abortion, he doesn't have one. Actually, the operative language should be; If a Conservative doesn't want people killing babies, he thinks it should be outlawed. If a Liberal doesn't believe in killing babies, he thinks it's OK for others to do so. 
|
|
| Author: | Moby Grape [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: If a conservative doesn't like abortion, he thinks it should be outlawed. If a liberal doesn't approve of abortion, he doesn't have one. If an anti-abortionist conservative irresponsibly creates a LIFE in the heat of passion, they will carry it to full term in accordance with their beliefs. If a liberal irresponsibly creates a LIFE in the heat of passion, they call it a mistake and shred it to pieces vacuuming it out of the womb and if the unfortunate baby happens to survive this procedure it will simply be tossed in a bucket and left to die. |
|
| Author: | karent [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
If a Liberal doesn't believe in killing babies, he thinks it's OK for others to do so. That is why it's called pro-choice. |
|
| Author: | Robin Banks [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
Why would anyone think it would be ok for others to kill babies? |
|
| Author: | USMarine [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: If a Liberal doesn't believe in killing babies, he thinks it's OK for others to do so. That is why it's called pro-choice. Robin Banks wrote: Why would anyone think it would be ok for others to kill babies? Yes indeed, Robin. There is no such thing as pro-choice. You are either Pro-Life of Pro-Abortion. Calling the murder of a baby "choice" is a way for people who don't agree with it to assuage their conscience when other people have abortions. As if it makes the act of killing a baby any less repulsive. It's the same as a rapist claiming he raped a woman out of "love" for her when the fact is that rape is NOT an act of love but an act of violence. Killing a baby and using the term "choice" does not alter the reality that abortion is taking the life of another human being. Plain and simple. |
|
| Author: | Tiger1 [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
Robin Banks wrote: Why would anyone think it would be ok for others to kill babies? The same attitude was prevalent in Germany during WW2. Substitute baby with Jew. |
|
| Author: | happy jack [ Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: If a conservative doesn't like abortion, he thinks it should be outlawed. If a liberal doesn't approve of abortion, he doesn't have one. That’s because the conservative is speaking for the one who cannot speak – the baby. The conservative sees the evil, and does whatever can be done to try to stop it. But if a liberal doesn’t approve of abortion, he or she obviously sees the evil yet chooses to do nothing to stop it, due to cowardice, peer pressure, or simple apathy. The liberal, by supporting the pro-choice philosophy, takes away the voice of the one who cannot speak. |
|
| Author: | happy jack [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: If a Liberal doesn't believe in killing babies, he thinks it's OK for others to do so. That is why it's called pro-choice. Wow. If a liberal doesn't believe in killing adults or robbing banks or gang rape but thinks it's OK for others to do so, is that still pro-choice? And, if so, does that mean that being pro-choice is always a good thing? |
|
| Author: | karent [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
Jack, all your examples are illegal. When I hear "killing babies", I envision post-birth children. |
|
| Author: | Tiger1 [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: Jack, all your examples are illegal. No, they are not. Killing adults has been legal in this past century, besides killing babies. Ask a Jew about Nazi Germany. When I hear "killing babies", I envision post-birth children. So, Karen, what are the babies in the mothers womb? A frog, fish, snake, pig, etc??? THEY ARE HUMAN BEINGS, just like the mother. When you define the worth of a human being by it's age, disability, ethnic, religion, etc, the human race as a whole has evolved into BARBARIANS. |
|
| Author: | USMarine [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
karent wrote: Jack, all your examples are illegal. When I hear "killing babies", I envision post-birth children. Interesting. So you have no moral or ethical problem with segregation or slavery whilst they were occuring since they were legal at the time? And you have no moral or ethical problem with the Prophet Mohammad marrying a 6 year old girl and then consummating the marriage (that means he had sex with her) when she was 9 years old because it was legal? Hows about burning "witches" during the Salem Witch Trials..? It was clearly "legal" to burn the women because they had due process and it was "legal" when it happened, yes? Denying women and blacks the right to vote was also morally and ethically acceptable until the law was changed because it was "legal" and so it was A-OK? Stoning women to death in Iran or other Muslim countries is OK as well because it's "legal" in those countries? Tiger1 wrote: So, Karen, what are the babies in the mothers womb? A frog, fish, snake, pig, etc??? THEY ARE HUMAN BEINGS, just like the mother. When you define the worth of a human being by it's age, disability, ethnic, religion, etc, the human race as a whole has evolved into BARBARIANS. Indeed. Much as Tiger's example of the Jews being killed in WW2 (which was "legal" in Germany) because they were not considered fully "human", (blacks were considered "legally" to count as 3/5 of their total number for purposes of taxation and congressional representation..but I digress) it is much easier to consider a baby still in the womb as somehow not being actually "human" although they clearly are, and so they can be killed with impunity without considering the moral or ethical aspects of such a revolting act. It is a cowardly rationale for condoning a morally reprehensible crime. |
|
| Author: | happy jack [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
USMarine wrote: Hows about burning "witches" during the Salem Witch Trials..? She turned me into a newt!!! |
|
| Author: | USMarine [ Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: difference between us and them. |
happy jack wrote: USMarine wrote: Hows about burning "witches" during the Salem Witch Trials..? She turned me into a newt!!! Classic...!!!!!   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|