Should sparks be banned

suzyq · **Joined:** Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:00 pm **Posts:** 993

What does the A stand for dave A ****

brownb · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:05 pm **Posts:** 31

It stands for AZZWIPE

suzyq · **Joined:** Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:00 pm **Posts:** 993

Edge you voted for short stroke to stay isn't that sweet. Or was it you freetime??

freetime · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:22 pm

I'm no big fan of Sparks, but from what I have seen I don't think he deserves to be banned.
I just ignore many of his posts and advise those of you who want him banned do the same.

freetime · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:24 pm

suzyq wrote:

Edge you voted for short stroke to stay isn't that sweet. Or was it you freetime??

Yes it was me.

Martha · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:48 pm

As much as I dislike Sparks.
And have told him so in a forum.

If you don't like the person, DON'T READ THEM.

I don't believe that a person should be banned just
because they anger people, or the people don't like
what they post.

censorthis · **Joined:** Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:09 pm **Posts:** 643

Martha wrote:

I don't believe that a person should be banned just
because they anger people, or the people don't like
what they post.

Agreed.....BUT.....if the administrator chooses to clean house and wants to do so in a fair manner, squirts would have to go....as would the OLT540.

Martha · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:29 pm

It is up to the Admin who goes and who stays.
Who is on restriction.

It isn't up to the people of the BB.

There may be people that we all don't like.
But they have the right to voice their thoughts like
the rest of us.

I'm sure that the Admin has a line that he doesn't want posters to cross.

But it is up to him not us.

censorthis wrote:

Agreed.....BUT.....if the administrator chooses to clean house and wants to do so in a fair manner, squirts would have to go....as would the OLT540.

freetime · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:16 pm

Here's exactly what the Admin said in the Hammond forum in August 2008 about his criteria for banning members. Does it fit Sparks?

- Threads whose sole purpose is to attack or harass another member are not permitted. This includes those threads, which pretend to be discussing some harmless topic, but in reality their intent is to harass or threaten another member. Those who start or participate in these threads will be banned and the threads will be deleted.

- Members who relentlessly attack and harass other members.

- Members whose primary purpose is to disrupt the forum.

Pretty simple. Be civil or be gone.

Martha · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:57 pm

I'm sure that the Admin has a line that he doesn't want posters to cross.

But it is up to him not us.

............................................................

freetime wrote:

Here's exactly what the Admin said in the Hammond forum in August 2008 about his criteria for banning members. Does it fit Sparks?

- Threads whose sole purpose is to attack or harass another member are not permitted. This includes those threads, which pretend to be discussing some harmless topic, but in reality their intent is to harass or threaten another member. Those who start or participate in these threads will be banned and the threads will be deleted.

- Members who relentlessly attack and harass other members.

- Members whose primary purpose is to disrupt the forum.

Pretty simple. Be civil or be gone.

freetime · **Posted:** Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:13 pm

True. It's strictly up to the Admin, and IMO he has been pretty fair about things.
Nice to see you posting again, Martha. You are always so reasonable.

happy jack · **Joined:** Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:32 am **Posts:** 3789

BigWhiteGuy · **Posted:** Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:39 am

He's a pain-in-the-ass, but everything has a purpose. If this clown was banned, you guys may just start picking on me!

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

BigWhiteGuy wrote:

He's a pain-in-the-ass, but everything has a purpose. If this clown was banned, you guys may just start picking on me!

Welcome back,BWG. Hope your wife is doing better.

LoisLane · **Joined:** Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:23 am **Posts:** 1641

freetime wrote:

Here's exactly what the Admin said in the Hammond forum in August 2008 about his criteria for banning members. Does it fit Sparks?

- Threads whose sole purpose is to attack or harass another member are not permitted. This includes those threads, which pretend to be discussing some harmless topic, but in reality their intent is to harass or threaten another member. Those who start or participate in these threads will be banned and the threads will be deleted.

- Members who relentlessly attack and harass other members.

- Members whose primary purpose is to disrupt the forum.

Pretty simple. Be civil or be gone.

YES

Northwest Indiana Discussion

Should sparks be banned

Who is online