IF YOU THINK PALINS CLOTHES ARE EXPENSIVE....

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Sheeet...Obammy's granny and brother could have lived like kings and queens with less than 10% of that..

Quote:

Obama spent nearly $700,000 for stage, lights in Berlin
Washington Times

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama paid a German company nearly $700,000 for staging, sound and lighting services at the time he delivered a speech this summer in Berlin and declared himself a citizen of both the U.S. and the world.

BREAK

was organized by the Berlin-based company Mediapool, opening much like a rock concert, with warm-up performances from the band Reamonn and reggae singer Patrice.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/31/obama-spent-nearly-700000-for-stage-lights-in-berl/

And this loser wants MORE of MY MONEY....

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

remember all the whining the useful idiot did about Palin spending money on clothes?

Quote:

Media Matters Attacked Palin For Clothing Costs, Defend Michelle Obama
Big Journalism, by Dana Loesch

The Soros and SEIU-funded Media Matters is smarting over three losses these past two weeks. First there was the Simon Wiesenthal Center slamming Media Matters for America for its anti-Israel screeds, the second was Politico calling the propaganda site a â€œcore institutionâ€ of the Democrat party, and the third was the Girls Scouts backing away from linking to the site in its brochures. Because of this stellar track record Media Matters decides to throw another noodle at the wall and reverse its position on â€œclass warfareâ€ by defending the $2k dresses (to say nothing of the shoes and handbags) worn by the First Lady:

- Michelle Obama wears two-thousand dollar sundresses on her taxpayer-supported Hawaiian vacation. Do you think the media will report this the same way they reported Gingrichâ€™s Tiffany credit line or Romneyâ€™s bet?

Not only will the media not report on this, but propaganda sites like Media Matters defend it â€“ yet they attacked Sarah Palin for slamming the wardrobe criticism and tried to justify it by saying that the other political candidates were subjected to the same level of scrutiny, which was a lie.

Boston.com noted the difference in treatment of Palin on the campaign trail:

â€¦ there does appear to be more attention paid to female candidatesâ€™ appearance, both Hillary Clinton (her blouses and pantsuits) during the primaries, and now Palin, as the second woman to run on a major-party ticket.

As a capitalist, I donâ€™t have a problem with people who want to spend their wealth as they see fit (taxpayers do not purchase clothing for the president and their families). I do have a problem with the hypocrisy espoused by progressives when they attack Palin over her (RNC-provided) wardrobe cost, Gingrich over a private line of credit, Romney over a bet, or any other conservative who shows the slightest sign of monetary success. Their hypocrisy is the issue.

http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/1 ... lle-obama/

the never-ending hypocrisy of the Left...

Northwest Indiana Discussion

IF YOU THINK PALINS CLOTHES ARE EXPENSIVE....

Who is online