Further proof why conservatives are the most...

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Quote:

MSNBC's Thomas Roberts Laughably
Insists Democrats Didn't Control
Congress for Two Years of Obama Term
NewsBusters, by Matt Vespa

In the wake of Romneyâ€™s â€œ47 percentâ€ comments and less than positive polling from key swing states, every squishy Republican in the liberal media's stable of acceptable Republicans went into full panic mode. But just yesterday, President Obama made a huge admission when he admitted that his biggest miscalculation was that he thought he could change Washington from the inside.

Republican strategist Alice Stewart raised that point during a chat with MSNBC's Thomas Roberts this morning, blasting Obama for it and saying that he had two years in his term in which his party ran both houses of Congress. That's an indisputable fact, but Roberts insisted that Stewart was wrong on the length of time that Democrats in Obama's term controlled both the House and Senate: [See video below break. MP3 audio here.]

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matt-vespa ... z27D856sIc

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:49 am

chuckmo48 · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:59 pm

-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:

...and how many died on 9/11 under bush's watch...and how many died in bush's two wars?

chuckmo48 · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:02 pm

Boehner Says Out Loud He Hopes Blacks and Latinos 'Won't Show Up' This Election

...on another front:

Quote:

Doug Priesse, chair of the Franklin County, Ohio, Republican Party, indicated restrictions on early voting hours and voter ID laws were meant to keep blacks from voting.

Quote:

In June, Pennsylvania House Republican leader Mike Turzai conceeded the point of voter ID is to help Republicans win when he said, "Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."

http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-says-loud-hopes-blacks-latinos-wont-show-185558772.html

chuckmo48 · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:04 pm

Thanks a lot George...

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:21 pm

chuckmo48 wrote:

]and how many died on 9/11 under bush's watch...and how many died in bush's two wars?[/b][/color][/size]

How novel, a liberal blaming Bush after 3.75 years of Barry.

When the truth is, just like everything else, it is far worse under Barry.

More troop death during Barry's 3.75 years, than during Bush's 8 years.

70% of U.S. Military Fatalities in 11-Year Afghan War Have Occurred on Obama's Watch

Of the 1,912 U.S. military personnel who have died in the now nearly 11-year-long war in Afghanistan, 1,343 have died since President Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009.

Seventy percent of the Afghan War casualties have happened on Obama's watch.

The war in Afghanistan started on Oct. 7, 2001, when the United States invaded that country to track down al Qaeda terrorists and overthrow the Taliban regime that had provided sanctuary to al Qaeda in the years before the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

So far this year, 155 U.S. military personnel have died in Afghanistan. That is about 22 percent less than the 198 U.S. military personnel who were killed in Afghanistan from January to June last year. May was the deadliest month so far in 2012 with 40 deaths. It was also deadliest May of the war.

The three years of the Obama have been the three deadliest for U.S. forces in Afghanistan. In 2009, 303 U.S. service members perished there. In 2010, 497 did. In 2011, 399 U.S. military personnel died in Afghanistan.

Obama has also presided over the top five deadliest months of the war, which include: August 2011, when there were 71 deaths; July 2010, when there were 65 deaths; June 2010, when there were 60 deaths; October 2009, when there were 58 deaths; and August 2010, when there were 55 deaths.

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:07 pm

chuckmo48 wrote:

Thanks a lot George...

-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:

Clinton's CIA Turned Down Chance To Get Bin Laden in 1999

Quote:

In late 1999, two years before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people, a group of Afghan agents loyal to an anti-Taliban guerrilla leader proposed assassinating Osama bin Laden. All they wanted was the $5 million reward the Clinton administration had offered for bin Ladenâ€™s capture, says a former Polish spy who was the Afghansâ€™ go-between on the plot.

The CIA rejected the plan, however, saying, â€œWe do not have a license to kill.â€

â€œThey gave us the exact location of the houses where bin Laden would be staying in Kandahar, the route he would be taking between his living quarters, his meeting place, and what kind of transportation he would be using,â€ Makowski told McClatchy in a recent interview, referring to the city in southern Afghanistan that was the Talibanâ€™s seat of power. The Afghans planned to use car bombs to kill the Saudi-born leader of al Qaida.

9/11, Iraq II, and Afghanistan could have all been avoided.

I posted this over 24 hours ago, and not a single peep from one of the leftoid moonbats.

Does that silence seem suspicious to anyone else?

You know, after Eight years of "Bush lied, people died" malarkey.

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

chuckmo48 · **Posted:** Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:38 pm

sparks wrote:

Exactly...they do not give one iota of compassion to anyone with their hatred...McConnell said it over two years ago...that their number one priority was to make sure the president was not re-elected...and the cons on this board don't care if the country goes down in flames just as long as their warped agenda comes through..how pathetic and typical...

Northwest Indiana Discussion

Further proof why conservatives are the most...

Who is online