Northwest Indiana Discussion

Northwest Indiana's Leading Discussion Forum
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am
Posts: 10483
chuckslomo48 wrote:
comedian wrote:
chuckslomo48 wrote:
Hey POS...I'm right here...You live in St. John...I'm real close...I would love to meet for a few rounds of whatever...
Now this little jackazz can sure dish it out but can't take it

I stand by original quote...let's meet...name it and I will be there...



Image

_________________
"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal" --Barack Hussein Obama
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 9660
Location: Stupid Liberals!
chuckmo48 wrote:
comedian wrote:
chuckmo48 wrote:
Hey POS...I'm right here...You live in St. John...I'm real close...I would love to meet for a few rounds of whatever...
Now this little jackazz can sure dish it out but can't take it

I stand by original quote...let's meet...name it and I will be there...

You lefties sure are an angry bunch, always with the threats of physical violence.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”
P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 3064
Location: In the trenches
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:
You lefties sure are an angry bunch, always with the threats of physical violence.

You ASSume too much...I still stand by original quote...any takers???????

_________________

I will lock her up! (DIDN'T HAPPEN)
I will repeal Obamacare (DIDN'T HAPPEN)
I will make Mexico to pay for the wall. (NO...WE ARE)
I will surround myself with the best people! (MOST ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 9660
Location: Stupid Liberals!
chuckmo48 wrote:
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:
You lefties sure are an angry bunch, always with the threats of physical violence.

You ASSume too much...I still stand by original quote...any takers???????

If you want to know when and where you are more and more likely to get you butt kicked, it'll be at the polls on 11/06.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”
P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:05 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am
Posts: 10483
chuckslomo48 wrote:
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:
You lefties sure are an angry bunch, always with the threats of physical violence.

You ASSume too much...I still stand by original quote...any takers???????


Image





:smt005 :smt006

_________________
"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal" --Barack Hussein Obama
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
so which is the lie edge?


is DUMBO for gay marriage or isn't he?

simple question.

I'll take your non reply as you are nothing but a shoe licking brown nosed DUMBO useful idiot



Quote:
2008 Biden debate: Obama and
I do not support gay marriage

Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering


During the 2008 Vice Presidential debate, Joe Biden clearly stated neither he nor Obama believed in gay marriage. “Let’s try to avoid nuance Senator,” began debate moderator Gwen Ifell to Joe Biden during the debate. “Do you support gay marriage?” “No.” Biden replied. “Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that.” Biden insisted that the definition of marriage should be “left to the faiths and the people that practice their faiths.”


http://washingtonexaminer.com/2008-bide ... le/2510433

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:15 am
Posts: 3630
chuckmo48 wrote:
You ASSume too much...I still stand by original quote...any takers???????


Trying to cover your threatening tracks now are ya? :smt005 :smt006

_________________
"President Xanax"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Romney Crushes Obama in Gallup: 52-45%
Breitbart's Big Government, by John Nolte


America's two top pollsters, Gallup and Rasmussen, both increased Romney's lead over Obama in the wake of the second presidential debate. With a one-third post-debate sample, today's Rasmussen has Romney up 49-47% and Gallup's 7-day tracker has Romney up 52-45%. Romney gained a point in both.

Most everyone was expecting Gallup to tighten today, including me. And you just know the Democrats and the media prayed to Gaia for a little movement their way.

Yesterday, I offered one possible explanation for the differences in the two polls. You can read that here.

Though it's entirely too early to tell what permanent effect (if any) a frantic and more conscious Obama performance in the second debate might do to the margins, a look at where the campaigns are at now does give us a clue.

There are rumors that Obama has all but given up on Florida, Virginia, and Colorado. The president is now practically living in Ohio and desperately hoping he won’t have to personally visit Michigan or Pennsylvania. The polls are most certainly closing in those two states which looked like sure things just a few weeks ago, but a visit would be a devastating admission of a campaign on the ropes.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... llup-52-45

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 993
chuckmo48 wrote:
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:
You lefties sure are an angry bunch, always with the threats of physical violence.

You ASSume too much...I still stand by original quote...any takers???????



You have a taker, bring it COWARD. AKA GUTLESS CHUCK :roll: :smt005 :smt005

_________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,
and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:28 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
No relief in N.J. to long gas lines; mass power outages likely to continue for days
Star-Ledger [Newark, NJ], by Richard Khavkine



Gas lines stretching onto highways and byways were just one obstacle as New Jerseyans continue their stutter steps toward normalcy following the region’s most devastating natural disaster in modern times. Bumper-to-bumper cars, trucks and SUVs stretched from the New Jersey Turnpike rest areas, taking up right lanes for up to a quarter of a mile. Where open and functioning gas stations could be found, people waited up to two hours for a share of those precious gallons. In some cases, they might have been paying more than they should have, and reports


http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/1 ... as_li.html




Where is all the outrage against DUMBO since he's NOT taking care of all of this?


fücking hypocrites all three.

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
'It's like the Wild West':
Lawlessness and fear take
over the outer boroughs
as they enter sixth day
without power

Daily Mail (UK), by Rachel Rickard Straus & Snejana Farber


As lights have begun flickering on in Lower Manhattan, residents of the Rockaways in Queens continued struggling without power, heat or food for a sixth day as their neighborhood slowly descended into chaos.

With little police presence on the storm-ravaged streets, many residents of the peninsula have been forced to take their protection into their own hands, arming themselves with guns, baseball bats and even bows and arrows to ward off thugs seeking to loot their homes.

It has been reported that crooks have been disguising themselves as Long Island Power Authority workers and coming by homes on the peninsula in the middle of the night while real utility workers were nowhere to be found.


Image

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2BBWi7Mpw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook






I'm sure you 3 ignorant shoe licking morons will find a way to blame it on Bush.

where IS YOUR messiah by the way?

shouldn't he be addressing this issue?

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:44 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 993
Eat the Rich? Papa John’s Boycott and the Left’s ‘Obamamath’



Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter is in trouble with the Left because, like several business owners since the re-election of the Man Who Would Be King, he has said he must reduce employee hours and possibly lay off workers to deal with the costs of Obamacare and the increasing number of regulations coming out of the Obama Administration.

The Left’s knee-jerk response has been to call for a boycott because Schnatter is wealthy and therefore he should just absorb any increase costs. Or the other analysis floating around the leftist blogs and places like Forbes is that Obamacare would only mean an increase of 14 cents per pizza, therefore Schnatter is just being evil, conservative and political.

Schnatter has said Obamacare could cost up to $8 million per year. The Left’s argument goes that $8 million is just a “drop in the bucket” for a company with total operating expenses of $1.131 billion last year.

A little analysis of the numbers published by Forbes, however, reveals a slightly different picture.

Papa John’s had total revenue of $1.218 billion last year, according to Forbes. That means a total profit of $87 million. Sounds pretty good, right?

According to Forbes, Papa John’s has more than 4,000 stores worldwide. Divide that $87 million by 4,000 and you get a per-store average profit of only $21,750.



Now, assuming Obamacare only applies to U.S. stores, then if we knew Papa John’s total U.S. stores (which Forbes doesn’t mention), we should be able to figure out per-store additional cost to U.S. franchisees.

]Just for the sake of argument, let’s guess that half the franchises are in the U.S. Let’s also assume the upper estimate of $8 million by Schnatter is correct, then that would be an additional $4,000 cost per store on average, bringing average per-store profit annually down to $17,750.

I’m not familiar with all the ins and outs of owning a franchise, but I assume that $17,750 profit gets divided between Papa Schnatter, shareholders and the actual franchise owner.

That’s not enough money to feed a family, and that’s why Obamacare hurts small businesses and the middle class.

That’s what the Left doesn’t get. And that’s why re-electing Obama is going to kill this country.[/b]ath/#ixzz2CRKPBO3c

_________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,
and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:03 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:24 am
Posts: 2529
suzyq wrote:
Eat the Rich? Papa John’s Boycott and the Left’s ‘Obamamath’



Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter is in trouble with the Left because, like several business owners since the re-election of the Man Who Would Be King, he has said he must reduce employee hours and possibly lay off workers to deal with the costs of Obamacare and the increasing number of regulations coming out of the Obama Administration.

The Left’s knee-jerk response has been to call for a boycott because Schnatter is wealthy and therefore he should just absorb any increase costs. Or the other analysis floating around the leftist blogs and places like Forbes is that Obamacare would only mean an increase of 14 cents per pizza, therefore Schnatter is just being evil, conservative and political.

Schnatter has said Obamacare could cost up to $8 million per year. The Left’s argument goes that $8 million is just a “drop in the bucket” for a company with total operating expenses of $1.131 billion last year.

A little analysis of the numbers published by Forbes, however, reveals a slightly different picture.

Papa John’s had total revenue of $1.218 billion last year, according to Forbes. That means a total profit of $87 million. Sounds pretty good, right?

According to Forbes, Papa John’s has more than 4,000 stores worldwide. Divide that $87 million by 4,000 and you get a per-store average profit of only $21,750.



Now, assuming Obamacare only applies to U.S. stores, then if we knew Papa John’s total U.S. stores (which Forbes doesn’t mention), we should be able to figure out per-store additional cost to U.S. franchisees.

]Just for the sake of argument, let’s guess that half the franchises are in the U.S. Let’s also assume the upper estimate of $8 million by Schnatter is correct, then that would be an additional $4,000 cost per store on average, bringing average per-store profit annually down to $17,750.

I’m not familiar with all the ins and outs of owning a franchise, but I assume that $17,750 profit gets divided between Papa Schnatter, shareholders and the actual franchise owner.

That’s not enough money to feed a family, and that’s why Obamacare hurts small businesses and the middle class.

That’s what the Left doesn’t get. And that’s why re-electing Obama is going to kill this country.[/b]ath/#ixzz2CRKPBO3c


Your math is entirely off and makes no sense. The profits of individual franchises would not be factored into the revenue or profit listed by the parent company. They are each individual companies.

Now you could factor into how many company owned stores that Papa John's has vs franchised locations, but my guess is that is substantially lower than 4,000. Not to mention that number of stores is worldwide and international locations wold not be affected by Obamacare.

See accounting can be tricky!!!!!

_________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 3800
mattlap wrote:
suzyq wrote:
Eat the Rich? Papa John’s Boycott and the Left’s ‘Obamamath’



Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter is in trouble with the Left because, like several business owners since the re-election of the Man Who Would Be King, he has said he must reduce employee hours and possibly lay off workers to deal with the costs of Obamacare and the increasing number of regulations coming out of the Obama Administration.

The Left’s knee-jerk response has been to call for a boycott because Schnatter is wealthy and therefore he should just absorb any increase costs. Or the other analysis floating around the leftist blogs and places like Forbes is that Obamacare would only mean an increase of 14 cents per pizza, therefore Schnatter is just being evil, conservative and political.

Schnatter has said Obamacare could cost up to $8 million per year. The Left’s argument goes that $8 million is just a “drop in the bucket” for a company with total operating expenses of $1.131 billion last year.

A little analysis of the numbers published by Forbes, however, reveals a slightly different picture.

Papa John’s had total revenue of $1.218 billion last year, according to Forbes. That means a total profit of $87 million. Sounds pretty good, right?

According to Forbes, Papa John’s has more than 4,000 stores worldwide. Divide that $87 million by 4,000 and you get a per-store average profit of only $21,750.



Now, assuming Obamacare only applies to U.S. stores, then if we knew Papa John’s total U.S. stores (which Forbes doesn’t mention), we should be able to figure out per-store additional cost to U.S. franchisees.

]Just for the sake of argument, let’s guess that half the franchises are in the U.S. Let’s also assume the upper estimate of $8 million by Schnatter is correct, then that would be an additional $4,000 cost per store on average, bringing average per-store profit annually down to $17,750.

I’m not familiar with all the ins and outs of owning a franchise, but I assume that $17,750 profit gets divided between Papa Schnatter, shareholders and the actual franchise owner.

That’s not enough money to feed a family, and that’s why Obamacare hurts small businesses and the middle class.

That’s what the Left doesn’t get. And that’s why re-electing Obama is going to kill this country.[/b]ath/#ixzz2CRKPBO3c


Your math is entirely off and makes no sense. The profits of individual franchises would not be factored into the revenue or profit listed by the parent company. They are each individual companies.

Now you could factor into how many company owned stores that Papa John's has vs franchised locations, but my guess is that is substantially lower than 4,000. Not to mention that number of stores is worldwide and international locations wold not be affected by Obamacare.

See accounting can be tricky!!!!!
The entire post was lifted from this obscure blog. Suzyq isn't smart enough to write anything worth reading.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8117/eat-the-rich-papa-johns-boycott-and-the-lefts-obamamath/

_________________
In the end, everything will be OK. If it's not OK, it's not the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: edge, sparkie chuksuk ??
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:49 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 993
sparks wrote:
mattlap wrote:
suzyq wrote:
Eat the Rich? Papa John’s Boycott and the ]The entire post was lifted from this obscure blog. Suzyq isn't smart enough to write anything worth reading.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8117/eat-the-rich-papa-johns-boycott-and-the-lefts-obamamath/[/b]



Never said i wrote it FAT AZZ no more obscure tham MSNBC, CBS, ABC or any other left wing crap you reference to... :smt006

_________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,
and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group