happy jack wrote:
Romney is hiding something?
Really?
What would that be?
The possibility that your hero didn't pay any taxes.
Quote:
As George Will and many others have noted, there must be something truly damaging in Romney’s pre-2010 tax returns for him to willingly endure the criticism and scrutiny that has accompanied his refusal to release them—a refusal he reiterated on Friday, even as the issue, and the matter of his departure date from Bain Capital, has engulfed the campaign. “The cost of not releasing the returns are clear,†Will said on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. “Therefore, he must have calculated that there are higher costs in releasing them.â€
So what could it be that Romney is so determined not to disclose?...
...As a member of the ultra-rich, Romney probably wasn’t spared major losses. And it’s possible he suffered a large enough capital loss that, carried forward and coupled with his various offshore tax havens, he wound up paying no U.S. federal taxes at all in 2009. If true, this would be politically deadly for him. Even assuming that his return was thoroughly clean and legal—a safe assumption, it seems to me—the fallout would dwarf the controversy that attended the news that Romney had paid a tax rate of just 14 percent in 2010 and that estimated he’d pay a similar rate in 2011.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/20 ... ax-returns The issue is not going away Rambo, your boy is going to get beat over the head on this till election day.Quote:
(You have no idea what you are talking about as far as this topic is concerned, and you most certainly had not a single clue what you were talking about in our discussion on the other board concerning so-called 'assault weapons'. If anyone needs to "get over it", it is you, who must attempt to get over your ignorance.)
Heh, I have nothing to get over,
you're the one that's having a hissy fit, not me.
Nice change of subject, LOL.