Northwest Indiana Discussion

For weeks now, Cheney himself, has been asking for documents to be released you moron...

who is going to make up this truth ''commission''...a bunch of dumbocrats lackeys hand picked by the messiah himself?....

release the documents (records) Cheney wants.....

Take your liberal doosh bag ''truth commission' and shove it...it's worthless..I don't believe for one goddamn minute that some "truth commission." made up by a democrat controlled Congress and any oath ANY liberal takes will cause the truth to come out....

put her on lie a detector

That's it right there, Moby.

Pelosi wanted a truth commission BEFORE the truth started coming out.
She is counting on being shielded just like John "scumbag" Murtha is being shielded.

Pelosi figures she is too important and President Community Organizer will help protect her which is why she always drops to her knees when the little greaseball is around.

The whole Democrat controlled government has become an incestuous relationship that literally reeks of Chicago politics.

Speaking of Chicago politics/politicians who have relocated to D.C, I wonder if Rahm "The Enforcer" Emmanuel has got his story straight for the school grant deal with Blago??? Or, will Obama throw him under the bus, too.

Do you wonder why the liberals are totally silent on this?...


they're always no where to be found when the truth comes out....

MARK MY WORDS!.....these liberal doosh bags will come out and attack Cheney HIMSELF instead of what he said about Pelosi....I doubt they'll even address the FACTS he presented....

And I have a pretty good idea which boot licker on this board will get THAT ball rolling....

hell...they haven't even mentioned ANYTHING about ANY investigation into ''why the CIA lied to Pelosi''. while DUMBO skitters back down his rat hole to hide...

Bravo Mr. Cheney.

Which ones?

GOP Reveals Attacks Were Prevented, Democrats Furious

Friday, June 5, 2009 10:46 AM

By: Dave Eberhart Article Font Size






GOP members on the Intelligence Committee disclosed they were informed that enhanced interrogation methods such as waterboarding resulted in intelligence that preempted terrorist attacks. Democrats are furious that Republicans revealed information obtained in a closed-door session.


Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., a member of the subcommittee who attended the hearing, told the Hill newspaper: “The hearing did address the enhanced interrogation techniques that have been much in the news lately.”


“Based on what I heard and the documents I have seen, I came away with a very clear impression that we did gather information that did disrupt terrorist plots,” Kline added.


Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., ranking Republican on the Intelligence panel did not attend the hearing, but revealed to The Hill that he later spoke with Republicans on the subcommittee who did. He said, “I think the people who were at the hearing, in my opinion, clearly indicated that the enhanced interrogation techniques worked.”


Democrats lambasted their Republican counterparts for discussing the information that was provided behind locked doors.


“I am absolutely shocked that members of the Intelligence committee who attended a closed-door hearing… then walked out that hearing – early, by the way – and characterized anything that happened in that hearing,” Intelligence Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations chairwoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., told The Hill. “My understanding is that’s a violation of the rules. It may be more than that.”


The whole torture issue came to a head recently when Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., explained that although she had been briefed about the enhanced interrogation techniques by the CIA, she had not specifically been told that they were in active use. She then suggested that she had been misled by the CIA briefers, according to media reports.


“Democrats weren’t sure what they were going to get,” said Hoekstra by way of explaining why in his opinion, the hearing was closed in the first place. “Now that they know what they’ve got, they don’t want to talk about it.”


The hearing was listed strictly as a subcommittee hearing on “Interrogations.” A committee spokeswoman would not comment to The Hill whether controversial interrogation tactics were even discussed behind the closed doors.

Meanwhile, Republicans like Hoekstra continue to push for open hearings on interrogations – an expanded inquiry where Pelosi would testify under oath about what she was told by the CIA.

link please

what for?

huh?
you said:


You make that up youself & pull it out your @SS or did you copy that?
if it's a copy let's see the source. you more dense than usual today?

let's just say it's true.