Shhh ... don't call it 'Global Warming' anymore

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

USMarine wrote:

Are you prepared to see your utility bills more than triple and your energy use rationed...?

Are you prepared to see food costs skyrocket..?

Why should these imbeciles care what the cost is?.....they expect their messiah to pay for it...

Screech · **Joined:** Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:57 pm **Posts:** 1751

I think people like free and skraps have produced enough evidence for a new condition. Maybe they can call it algorephobia. :lol:

freetime · **Posted:** Mon May 04, 2009 8:02 am

I believe it is you right-wingers who are fear mongering. Your insults can not change my mind on this issue.
I've seen my energy bills skyrocket already, due to plain old profiteering by the energy monopolies. And they are destroying MY beautiful earth at the same time!
Screech, I'm kind of surprised at you. As a God-fearing woman, I would think you'd be concerned about saving his glorious planet for future generations.

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

freetime wrote:

I've seen my energy bills skyrocket already, due to plain old profiteering by the energy monopolies. And they are destroying MY beautiful earth at the same time!

You haven't seen anything yet, freetime.... :shock:

Look to California if you want to see a harbinger of what is to come.

You are caught up in emotion and so you believe a lie.

Both about Conservatives not wanting conservation and clean air and water and the BIG lie about the Great Global Warming Apocalypse.

Neither lie can stand the light of day nor can they hold up in a rational discussion.

Screech · **Joined:** Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:57 pm **Posts:** 1751

freetime wrote:

I believe it is you right-wingers who are fear mongering. Your insults can not change my mind on this issue.
I've seen my energy bills skyrocket already, due to plain old profiteering by the energy monopolies. And they are destrying MY beautiful earth at the same time!
Screech, I'm kind of surprised at you. As a God-fearing woman, I would think you'd be concerned about saving his glorious planet for future generations.

As a God-fearing woman, I know there is nothing man can do that God doesn't allow. I also know that He will be back real soon. I also know that He created this earth to cleanse itself, even if it would be of flesh man, before it would allow itself to be damaged beyond repair. As a God-fearing woman, I have faith in the way He created us and the earth, so I don't allow left-wing exploiters to scare me into thinking drastic action has to be taken at the cost of liberties given by God.

freetime · **Posted:** Mon May 04, 2009 8:11 am

The corrupt, Bush-protected Enron had a LOT to do with California's energy problems.

But California is a good example of non-sustainable growth.

We've really got to stop developing deserts to live on.

Screech · **Joined:** Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:57 pm **Posts:** 1751

freetime wrote:

The corrupt, Bush-protected Enron had a LOT to do with California's energy problems.

But California is a good example of non-sustainable growth.

We've really got to stop developing deserts to live on.

Look at the big picture, not just California!

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

freetime wrote:

The corrupt, Bush-protected Enron had a LOT to do with California's energy problems.

But California is a good example of non-sustainable growth.

We've really got to stop developing deserts to live on.

Freetime, you simply misunderstand what is going with California and their energy problems.

It has nothing to do with Enron or anything President Bush did or didn't do.

I can supply you with the names of several books to read if you want to bring yourself up to speed on the Great Global Warming Apocalypse.

It is a false doctrine propagated by false information based on psuedo-science.

Screech wrote:

Look at the big picture, not just California!

Indeed.

But California is a good example to bring it down to scale for easier understanding.

:smt006

freetime · **Posted:** Mon May 04, 2009 8:23 am

I was responding to Marine when I wrote that.

You posted in the meantime.

I DO try to look at the big picture, which is why GLOBAL climate change upsets me so.

happy jack · **Joined:** Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:32 am **Posts:** 3789

sparks wrote:

I think we all can agree that computers improve our quality of life. Since no one is willing to revert back to the stone age, we need to find a way to generate electricity without destroying our air and water and land.

I think you mean that you are not willing to revert to the Stone Age, but everyone else should. You are free to operate any and all electrical appliances you may own, and you are free to waste untold amounts of fossil fuel flying to Ireland. Everyone else should make the sacrifices so that you may remain free to do these things.
I think that about sums it up.

Gunslinger · **Joined:** Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:53 pm **Posts:** 885

free wrote: Don't you folks have kids? What kind of world do you want them to inherit?

I want my grandchildren to inherit an earth that doesn't have quatrillions in debt to the Chinese!

freetime · **Posted:** Mon May 04, 2009 9:23 am

Too late for that, I'm afraid. We've been borrowing from them for decades now.
I agree it's a bad idea.

comedian · **Joined:** Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:15 am **Posts:** 3630

Print Email AmSpecBlog
Even Greater Disbelief of Alarmists
By Paul Chesser on 4.20.09 @ 2:45PM

Rasmussen has done another poll of registered voters about their views on global warming, just three months after a surprise revelation that more believe that natural causes drive climate than humans. Here are the findings reported Friday:

Climate change caused by planetary trends: 48%

Climate changed caused by human activity: 34%

Other reason: 7%

Arenâ€™t sure: 11%

Compare that to responses reported on January 19:

Climate change caused by planetary trends: 44%

Climate changed caused by human activity: 41%

Other reason: 7%

Arenâ€™t sure: 9%

So in the space of just three months, the percentage of those polled who believe humans drive climate change dropped seven percentage points from an already low 41 percent, while those who are confident that natural causes influence climate more increased by four percentage points.

If this represented an actual election it would be called a landslide of historic proportions. I mean really â€” only one-third of people believe humans are the chief cause of climate change?

Anyone ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head examined. :idea:

freetime · **Posted:** Mon May 04, 2009 10:47 am

It doesn't matter to me how many people are buying into the propaganda that global warming is a myth.
The oil companies have billions at stake in keeping us dependent on fossil fuels. That buys a lot of media.
I prefer to listen to what the scientists are saying, like in this:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Featur ... alWarming/

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

freetime wrote:

It doesn't matter to me how many people are buying into the propaganda that global warming is a myth.
The oil companies have billions at stake in keeping us dependent on fossil fuels. That buys a lot of media.
I prefer to listen to what the scientists are saying, like in this:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Featur ... alWarming/

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is the same media that adores the Obamas.....who tell the truth of course....

BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Northwest Indiana Discussion

Shhh ... don't call it 'Global Warming' anymore

Who is online