Northwest Indiana Discussion

Northwest Indiana's Leading Discussion Forum
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:14 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:27 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 775
Location: The Region
http://www.newsbusters.org/

Exposing Liberal Media Bias

there is a free bumper sticker about not beliving the liberal media


http://media.eyeblast.org/newsbusters/g ... Busted.jpg

MLBS-Ad-AboveNBusted.jpg

Questions? Email us at mrcaction@mediaresearch.org

http://www.mrcaction.org/551/petition.asp?PID=24552091

Fill out the form below and we'll send you your sticker right away!


Please allow 2-4 weeks for delivery.



"Show the liberals in the media what you think of them!"
-Mark Levin



IT'S TIME TO TAKE A STAND!
Tell the world how you feel about the liberal media with your free bumper sticker from NewsBusters and the Media Research Center - America's Media Watchdog!

_________________

When the government fears the People, that is Liberty.
When the People fear the Government, that is tyranny."
~ Thomas Jefferson
...................................
HOW TO FIX 2011 - REPEAT 1776


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 9660
Location: Stupid Liberals!
September 10, 2011
Media alters transcript to hide Obama gaffe
Timothy Birdnow

Barack Obama has gone to Congress asking for more money to spend. The President, in a rambling and tedious exercise mixing blame with demands, made quite a few dubious statements in laying out the case for Congress to vote for the plan which as yet does not exist. Much like Obamacare, Congress must ultimately vote for the bill to know what is in it.

At one point Mr. Obama made a major gaffe; he identified Abraham Lincoln as the founder of the Republican Party.

Lincoln did not join the Republicans until 1856, over two years after the party was founded. The first Republican convention was held in Ripon, Wisconsin in 1854.

Such a gaffe would have brought huge amounts of ridicule and derision on George W. Bush, but in the case of Obama the media yawned.


Actually, they did more than yawn; government-funded PBS has altered the transcript of the President's speech, removing the offending comment.

The New York Times transcript has the following quote:

Quote:
"We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our Union. Founder of the Republican Party. But in the middle of a civil war, he was also a leader who looked to the future -- a Republican President who mobilized government to build the Transcontinental Railroad -- (applause) -- launch the National Academy of Sciences, set up the first land grant colleges. (Applause.) And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set."

But how does it appear in the PBS transcript?

Quote:
"We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our Union. But in the middle of a Civil War, he was also a leader who looked to the future - a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad; launch the National Academy of Sciences; and set up the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set."


So PBS has purposely altered a transcript containing a major gaffe by the President.

Sure; we have a fair and balanced media! The best government money can buy!

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”
P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:08 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:
At one point Mr. Obama made a major gaffe; he identified Abraham Lincoln as the founder of the Republican Party


A shining example of the effects of getting your A+ in history through Affirmative Action...

everyone in the 57 states knows that.



Image

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:27 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Laying Down Astro Turf
On Wall Street

Investor's Business Daily, by David Hogberg


The Occupy Wall Street rally may not be growing, but press coverage of it is.

Even some members of Congress, like Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn, are endorsing it.


Last night on the O’Reilly factor, Gretchen Carlson warned: “It would be dangerous for any politician to align themselves with this group. It’s dangerous if it continues to become more violent.” (Hat Tip: Alex Alvarez at Mediaite.)

Fortunately, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi dismissed them as “astroturf.” Oh wait, no, that’s what she said of the Tea Parties. These were her sentiments about the Occupy Wall Street folks:

“God bless them,” Pelosi said, “for their spontaneity. It’s independent . . . it’s young, it’s spontaneous and it’s focused. And it’s going to be effective.”

She added: “The message of the protesters is a message for the establishment everyplace. No longer will the recklessness of some on Wall Street cause massive joblessness on Main Street.”

Pelosi did not comment on — and was not asked about — the law-breaking that occurred during the protest over the weekend.

Meanwhile, CNN tries to find moral equivalence between the Occupy Wall Street crowd and the Tea Party:


With all of that rage, Tea Partyers can attest, trouble can brew quickly.

Violent clashes between Occupy Wall Street protesters and New York City police officers have raised obvious questions about the demonstrators’ intentions.

Open story: Are you involved?

“It’s a classic mob uprising. It’s utterly incoherent. They’re always left wing,” conservative commentator Ann Coulter said in a Fox News interview.

During the height of the Tea Party movement, there were few confrontations with police. But violent rhetoric was often caught on camera and immediately uploaded onto YouTube.

“If ballots don’t work, bullets will,” Tea Party activist and radio talk show host Joyce Kaufman said at a rally about the midterm elections of 2010.

Is CNN really so dense that it can’t distinguish between a violent clash and inappropriate, over-heated rhetoric? Never mind, that’s a rhetorical question. Here is the AFL-CIO blog boasting about union involvement:

http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/ ... -tea-party

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:31 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Behar to Cain: GOP Hasn’t Been
‘Black Friendly’ for Centuries

Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston


Presidential hopeful Herman Cain made an appearance on ABC’s The View this week and had to deflect staggering ignorance from host Joy Behar. Discussing Cain’s assertion that some blacks are “brainwashed” not to consider any conservative ideas, the very first sentence out of Behar’s mouth was “The Republican Party hasn’t been black friendly over the many centuries in this country.”

Sadly, the coffee klatch program is what passes for as “intelligent” conversation on TV these days. Behar’s blather is ignorant in a million ways and indicative of the historical illiteracy of the far left in this country.

First, of course, this county hasn’t even been a country for “many centuries.” We are only about 235 years old as a nation! Most people don’t claim two as “many,” but only as “a couple.”

Second, the Republican Party has also not been around for “many centuries in this country.” The party is only about 155 years old.

Third, when the party itself was started it was derisively called the “Black Republicans” by Behar’s beloved Democrats because it was so friendly to America’s blacks. The party was founded with a pro-black agenda, its primary goal being the abolition all blacks from slavery and assuring them civil rights. In fact, for many decades after the Civil War and on into the 1900s most black Americans were Republicans, not Democrats. The very first blacks elected to Congress ran as Republicans. Blacks being Democrats is a relatively new development in our history.

In fact, if it wasn’t for the Republican Party the Civil Rights Act of 1964 could not have passed.


http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/ ... centuries/



:roll:

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
ABC Enters Full Cheerleading Mode
for Leftist Protests ‘Growing in
Size and Diversity’

Newsbusters, by Brent Baker


ABC stepped up its promotion Sunday night on behalf of the far-left protesters, which they failed to label, making a special effort to explain and frame their grievances – a service they never provided to the Tea Party. “Tonight, the anger spreads,” anchor David Muir hailed in teasing World News on Sunday night. “Those Wall Street protests now going global. This evening here, we learn about the lives behind the protesters here in this country, showing up in cities coast to coast.”

Muir pointed viewers to a sign he liked: “Look at the images coming in tonight, spelling out the anger. This sign in New York, ‘The rich get bailed out, the poor get sold out.’” He relayed ABC’s goal, “We ask a simple question: What’s happened in the lives of the Americans who’ve joined these protests. What was it that set them off?”

In the lead story, reporter Cecilia Vega championed: “The anger is in Las Vegas, the protests are huge in Houston. The frustration is in Portland. The outrage has spread all the way to Anchorage, Alaska. This is a group of protesters that is certainly growing in size and diversity.”


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bake ... ze-and-div

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:31 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Jake Tapper Asks Obama About
Fast And Furious In Unaired
Portion Of Interview

Mediaite, by Tommy Christopher


Perhaps there’s no greater political Rorschach test than the way people react to certain news stories. Currently, the news catnip du jour for conservatives are Solyndra and Fast and Furious, each of which has received a middling amount of coverage in the mainstream press. Today, conservative media watchdog Newsbusters expressed outrage that a Fast and Furious question was left out of ABC News broadcasts of Jake Tapper‘s exclusive interview with President Obama. Fortunately, we’ve got the exchange here.

The news catnip phenomenon isn’t exclusive to conservatives, but as the current political opposition, they are naturally more susceptible. During the Bush administration, there were a raft of stories that liberals felt weren’t getting enough attention. Sometimes, the criticisms of the media are valid, sometimes not. Often, partisans on either side ascribe left/right bias to such editorial decisions, but even when the criticism is valid, the bias is usually far shallower.

In Fast and Furious, conservatives see a scandal that could take down the entire Obama administration, while liberals see a botched law enforcement operation that Congressional Republicans are overselling with a legislative hearing fishing trip. The mainstream media, meanwhile, has been covering the story, and following it to see where it goes, and in some cases, leading the charge.

It is in that context that you should evaluate conservative criticism of ABC News’ decision not to include the President’s response to Tapper’s Fast and Furious question in its broadcasts. Here’s a transcript of the exchange, from ABC News’ Nightline:

Tapper: “Just to change the subject from the economy, the ‘Fast and Furious’ controversy. Aside from some of the more wild charges out there, this is a big scandal. The Justice Department, the ATF was moving guns and some of them were tied to crime scenes. what was your response when you first heard about it?”

Obama: “Well I heard about it from the news reports. This is not something we were aware of in the White House and the Attorney General it turns out wasn’t aware of either. Obviously Eric Holder has launched a full investigation of this, it is not acceptable for us to allow guns to go into Mexico. Our whole goal has been to interdict aggressively in the flow of weapons and cash flowing south into Mexico because the Mexican president, President Calderon, has done a heroic job of trying to take on these transnational drug cartels. So this investigation will be complete, people who have screwed up will be held accountable but our overarching goal consistently has been to say we’ve got a responsibility not only to stop drugs from flowing north, we’ve also got a responsibility to make sure we are not helping to either arm or finance these drug cartels in Mexico. So it’s very upsetting to me to think that somebody showed such bad judgment that they would allow something like that to happen and we will find out who and what happened in this situation and make sure it gets corrected.”

Newsbusters‘ Scott Whitlock took exception to the omission (in the headline, NB says ABC “spiked” the question), especially in light of Nightline‘s inclusion of another segment:


ABC’s Jake Tapper on Tuesday pressed Barack Obama on the Fast and Furious gun scandal, but his network didn’t allow the question to appear on Nightline, World News or Good Morning America. (All played clips of the interview.) Instead, ABC found time to air Tapper and the President playfully discussing children’s books and the greatness of Dr. Seuss.


During the two-segment long Nightline interview, Tapper hyped, “At the school where we spoke, the President showed off his personal knowledge of children’s books.” The journalist informed Obama, “I’m a big Dr. Seuss guy.”

Here’s the clip that Whitlock was referring to:


Now, to an audience thirsty for any and all things Fast and Furious, that choice does seem absurd, but from a media standpoint, is it really so cut-and-dried? The Dr. Seuss clip is unusual and entertaining, a humanizing, unguarded moment for reporter and subject alike. Its news value rests largely in its behind-the-curtain vibe. The real question isn’t why they included the Seuss clip, but why the Fast and Furious question was omitted.READ MORE


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jake-tapper- ... interview/


_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:32 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
ABC Skips Subpoena of Obama
Emails on Solyndra Funding

Newsbusters, by Brad Wilmouth


Thursday's World News on ABC skipped the congressional decision to subpoena White House emails related to the Solyndra solar energy company that went into bankruptcy after receiving tax dollars. The CBS Evening News gave the story 22 seconds, while the NBC Nightly News included a 31-second news brief.

On CBS, anchor Scott Pelley related:

One cornerstone of President Obama's plan to jumpstart the economy is green energy, but today a House panel subpoenaed White House documents conerning Solyndra, the failed solar panel maker. The Obama administration gave the company more than half a billion dollars, but Solyndra filed for bankruptcy and laid off 1,100 workers.

And NBC anchor Brian Williams read the item:

The stage is set tonight for a potential constitutional showdown between the Obama White House and Congress after a congressional vote to subpoena internal White House emails, including those sent from the President's own Blackberry, related to that controversial half-billion-dollar taxpayer loan to Solyndra, the solar company that went bankrupt. Senior administration officials are signaling the White House is prepared to invoke executive privilege to keep those high-level emails private.


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmo ... z1cjnYsngU


The dems demanded Sarah Palin hand over her emails...

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:17 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Another NY Democrat Caught
With His Pants Down

Human Events, by JWF


You won't be reading this story in any national news outlets since the offender is a Democrat. Put an "R" behind his name and it would go viral. While there isn't anything necessarily criminal or as crude and lewd as an Anthony Weiner crotch photo, you have to question the judgment of a politican keeping nude photos of himself on his website.

Monroe County Legislator Stephen Eckel abruptly removed two nude photos of himself from a personal website on Friday after being questioned about them by a television reporter.

Eckel, 46, a Democrat from Rochester in the midst of a re-election campaign, said in a phone interview that he took the photos of himself in 2000 as a student at the Visual Studies Workshop while working on a master of fine arts degree at The College at Brockport. He received the degree a year later.

The sepia-toned photos, taken with a wide lens at an elevated angle, were full frontal nude shots of Eckel, but were not sexual in nature. He described them as art.

I could see if the guy was in his 20s he may not know better, but for a guy getting a master's at age 35, what is he thinking. Then when he's running for office he thinks it's still OK to have nude shots of himself online?

Naturally, he blames the evil Republicans for his problems, as if they posted the nude shots.


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47374

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:00 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
MSNBC host, Politico reporter snicker
at journalism's 'code of ethics'

The Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor


The Society of Professional Journalism’s code of ethics is unknown to, and easily dismissed by, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. On “Andrea Mitchell Reports” Monday, the anchor introduced Politico’s Jonathan Martin after playing a clip of former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain suggesting some reporters at an event in Texas check the Society of Professional Journalism’s “code of ethics.”

“Jonathan Martin is the senior reporter for Politico and broke the original story,” she said. “I assume you read the journalistic code of ethics, whatever that is.”

Martin replied by saying he had his copy “well-thumbed.”

Watch:


http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/07/msnbc ... ics-video/

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:42 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
as usual, DUMBO gets a pass...


Quote:
Obama 'not going to comment' on hot mic gaffe
Washington Examiner [DC], by Charlie Spiering



"Can you clarify your end of the “hot mic” conversation with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, as it involved Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu?" asked MSNBC's Chuck Todd yesterday about Obama's embarassing moment last week.

"With respect to the “hot mic” in France, I’m not going to comment on conversations that I have with individual leaders," said Obama, "But what I will say is this: The primary conversation I had with President Sarkozy in that meeting revolved around my significant disappointment that France had voted in favor of the Palestinians joining UNESCO, knowing full well that under our laws, that would require the United States cutting off funding to UNESCO, and after I had consistently made the argument that the only way we’re going to solve the Middle East situation is if Palestinians and Israelis sit down at the table and negotiate; that it is not going to work to try to do an end run through the United Nations."


http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer. ... -mic-gaffe

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 1:49 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Diane Sawyer Ruins Marvelous
Special on Gabby Giffords
By Attacking Sarah Palin

NewsBusters, by Noel Sheppard



ABC presented an absolutely marvelous special Tuesday evening about Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords' (D-Ariz.) remarkable recovery from a gunshot to the head last January.

After 36 minutes of uplifting scenes involving the Congresswoman's therapy and road back to being able to walk and speak, host Diane Sawyer for some reason felt the need to bring politics into the program at its conclusion while taking a truly pathetic swipe at former Alaska governor Sarah Palin (video follows with transcript and commentary):


http://m.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-she ... ng-sarah-p

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:33 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
NYTimes Avoids Word 'Obama,'
Buries Story on Plea to Delay
Solyndra Layoff News

Newsbusters, by Clay Waters



Energy Secretary Steven Chu is testifying today before a Congressional committee on Solyndra, the solar equipment maker favored by the Obama administration that went bankrupt after being pledged federal loan guarantees worth a half-billion dollars.

Revelations that the administration asked Solyndra to delay a layoff announcement until after the 2010 midterm elections made the front page of the Washington Post on Wednesday: “The Obama administration, which gave the solar company Solyndra a half-billion-dollar loan to help create jobs, asked the company to delay announcing it would lay off workers until after the hotly contested November 2010 midterm elections that imperiled Democratic control of Congress, newly released e-mails show.”

Meanwhile, the New York Times buried the revelation in a page 24 story Wednesday by Matthew Wald, “Solyndra Was Asked to Delay Layoff News Till After Midterms, Memo Says.”

And while the Post forthrightly identified 'The Obama administration" as the culprit, Wald’s opening paragraph only blamed “The Energy Department.” Bizarrely, the word “Obama” doesn’t appear in the story at all.


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-water ... z1e0KqK1Jg

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:35 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
the spin on this logic is so twisted I just know it makes edge green with envy....

Can you believe this?

The liberal media is now pushing the blame on the republicans for the Solyndra scandal.


Quote:
The Solyndra Mess
New York Times, by Editorial


The Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee appear to have hit the pause button on their investigation into the failure of Solyndra, a solar panel maker that entered bankruptcy proceedings in September, defaulting on a $528 million federal loan. What have we learned? Nobody comes out of this looking good. Not the Obama administration, which appears to have misread the market in its eagerness to proclaim that it was creating green jobs. Not the Republicans, either, as their partisanship turned a legitimate inquiry into a circus of broad accusations aimed more at tarnishing the administration than


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/25/opini ... ml?_r=2&hp

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Exposing Liberal Media Bias
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:57 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
blame someone else.

It's what the democrats do.


Quote:
Holder lashes out at The Daily Caller
while refusing to address growing
calls for his resignation

Daily Caller, by Neil Munro*


Embattled Attorney General Eric Holder today demanded The Daily Caller stop publishing articles about the growing calls in Congress for his resignation because of the failed Operation Fast and Furious gun-walking program.

As Holder’s aide was escorting the attorney general offstage following his remarks Tuesday afternoon at the White House, a Daily Caller reporter introduced himself and shook Holder’s hand. The reporter asked him for a response to the growing chorus of federal legislators demanding his resignation.

Holder stepped towards the exit, then turned around, stepped back toward the reporter, and sternly said, “You guys need to — you need to stop this. It’s not an organic thing that’s just happening. You guys are behind it.”

Holder then walked offstage without answering TheDC’s request for comment about calls for his resignation.

Watch:


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/29/holde ... z1fCFS1CgA

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group