Plasmatronics, Plasmatronics , Plasmatronics.
Seems to be ok here!
So the question is whether the city of CP put pressure on the Times board to eliminate all discussion of this questionable loan to a private company, or did the company well connected to Governor Daniels put the squeeze on?
Meanwhile many posters on the other board claim to not have a problem over the silencing of this questionable deal or of the reported pressure of slumlords and political figures to quash free debate.
Quash, for those who don't know is defined by WordWeb as:
1 Put down by force or intimidation
"The government quashes any attempt of an uprising"
2. Declare invalid
So it's no longer ok to question when the government takes questionable action with little or no debate? It's ok to give a free pass to shady business dealings a city is engaged in? It's ok to silence people because of their political views?
I tell you something BIG must be brewing. Could this be a pre-cursor to silencing opposition to the massive rail plan once funding schemes are finalized for the project? Could this even be used to lessen opposition to a future vote on a new tax?
Is it hard to imagine that there could be a loose connection to all these seemingly unrelated simultaneous events? Whether by design or pure coincidence the result is the same - silence of the lambs.
